Regional War Speedrun Edition?

why do the people with this stance justify the killing of innocent civilians in Pahalgam as 'well what did you expect when the govt occupied it'?

Setting aside the belligerent stupidity of the occupation nonsense, who made these people the incharge of deciding 25 Indians and 1 Nepali citizens were a-okay to kill because of a terrorist groups' crusade against the government if this is their stance on Pakistani civilians? Where was the outrage for the terorrists killing people instead of sending a strongly worded letter to the UN or whatever the hell you are expecting India to do in response to the killing of innocents?

My guy, either no civilians are fair game or all are. You don't get to decide Indian and Nepali lives matter less than your problematic faves lives. You're the one who started the grandstanding, at least stick to it.

terrorism isn't the fault of a state or its government though. just because terrorists allegedly from a given country carried out an attack doesn't really justify a military operation in that country. especially if everyone is opposed to those terrorists

Terrorism is not the fault of the helpless civilians of the state who are equally affected by it. However, terrorism is the fault of the government of the state, that continues to take no action and instead provide training to the terrorists, putting not only their country but countless innocent civilians - who despise terrorism as much - at risk. The attack - not only Pahalgam but countless cases of cross border terrorism which average atleast 2 incidents a year weren't "allegedly" from a specific country. Terror groups from within thay country have taken responsibility for most of the attacks including Pahalgam. Military operation has to be proceeded with if the terror harbouring country has been given numerous chances to combat and eliminate the terrorism on their own but have failed to do so over and over again and instead provide increased support. I understand that the Pakistani civilians don't like terrorism as much people think they do, because the rising levels of terrorism has an adverse effect on them as well but their own government and military has to understand this as well and work according to the needs of their people instead of inviting even more trouble.

since these pro-terrorist activists always want some western media validation - here it is :

nytimes.com

Reluctant at First, Trump Officials Intervened in South Asia as Nuclear Fears Grew

After Vice President JD Vance suggested that the conflict between India and Pakistan was not America’s problem, the Trump administration gre

This paper carries plenty of anti-India rhetoric, so you can rest assured it meets your fake ass 'standards for neutrality'.

so that's what happened

one of these days yeh america ka ladla beta pakistan hamare haath se bohot buri tarah se pitega

Trigger Warning - Photos of War

Scenes of unspeakable grief at the home of the Nargis Bano, Indian, 43, a fatal casualty in Pakistan shelling at LoC Uri sector.

Memes, according to my twitter feed right now

what has war ever brought?

they always do.

despite knowing India's capacity for a second strike.

The Pakistani leadership seems a-okay with implying that they will sacrifice their own civilians to save their personal egos or whatever it is they are wanting to protect by refusing to de-escalate.

rlly? playing the nuclear card?

Time to focus your anger on your Pakistani ministers who go onto international news media and accept the funding of terrorists then.

And this isn't some random illiterate guy, this is a Minister. His words are "have been doing this dirty work for about three decades now".

Thankfully, he accepts that it was a mistake and they are suffering from it now.

And the backdrop to this isn't that the world believes there aren't any terrorists in Pakistan at the moment. Here's the 2023 list from USA (no official announcement has come from the USA since this date about all terrorist groups suddenly disappearing)

No one in India wants to harm Pakistani civilians either. That's actually been the single most consistent restraint our official Ministry of Defence officials show attention to.

Are there some dorks on twitter calling for annihilation? Yes. On both sides, though. And these people call for annihilation during cricket matches too, they aren't our representatives the same way Pakistanis ask for the world to see that the terrorists who were born in Pakistan aren't the common people's representatives.

Instead of expecting a country that has been constantly attacked by terrorists to shut up and put up, ask the Pakistani leadership to focus on the people. India managed to grow its economy despite all manners of internal issues, surely it can't be that hard for Pakistan since your Military Chief just claimed in April 2025 that Pakistanis are superior to Indians.

Show your superiority by growing your country and improving the citizen's lives. No one with any brains in India wants terrorists to continue to flourish at the cost of Pakistani citizens.

All the people saying that Pakistan was funding the terrorists who attacked Kashmir, please tell me why the absolute FUCK would Pakistan do such a thing when we know that India would retaliate with all it's force?

Pakistani Government, however it may look from the outside, is not stupid. They know that we do not have even half of the military, arsenal, influence, or the budget that our neighbour has.

They also know that if there was such an open attack on Hindu people, on Indian administered soil, it would have consequences that they are not in the slightest prepared to deal with.

For god's sake, Pakistan has just come off the literal edge of bankruptcy. THEY DO NOT HAVE THE MONEY DO THIS SHIT, NOR DO THEY HAVE THE MENTAL STRENGTH. WE HAVE ENOUGH PROBLEMS AT HOME TO DEAL WITH ANOTHER ONE.

So please, enlighten me on why the Pakistani Government would shoot itself in the goddamn foot with its own gun by harbouring and sponsoring terrorists???

not your, the usual 'India protecting itself = India is invading Pakistan' people's standard of neutrality.

I should have articulated that better, my bad.

so that's what happened

one of these days yeh america ka ladla beta pakistan hamare haath se bohot buri tarah se pitega

Sky News report shows how the Markaz Taiba mosque, which India destroyed during the Operation Sindoor, have been linked to Al-Qaeda and Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists. 

this is for the Libtards who are parroting ¡slamist victim play sources and crying about how "India attacked a mosque!!" 

Pakistan wrapping up bodies of terrorists in its flag really tells you everything you need to know about this nation and its sick mentality

It's morally reprehensible to expect the price of peace to always be Indian lives.

I don't care if you hate 'pajeets' or whatever the newest slur you guys have cooked up for Indians is. The current world order has decades of agreement on the fact that all innocent lives matter equally.

So no, you can't chill and feel good about giving us thoughts and prayers while my people die horrid deaths just so your feelings are protected.

We don't like that civilians on the adversary's side are dying either. But no reasonable country is going to sign off on its own citizens continuing to die at random because some malcontents amongst its neighbours just want to see them die. Don't hold us to moral standards you yourselves don't meet.

When Peace Becomes a Wound: India, Terrorism, and the Weight of Restraint

I’ve always believed in peace. I still do. I don’t dream of war. I don’t find glory in bloodshed. And I certainly don’t believe revenge heals grief. But what happens when the very peace you’re protecting is the reason you keep losing your people? What happens when the other side doesn’t believe in peace at all?

This blog isn’t written out of hatred. It’s written out of heartbreak, confusion, and the raw frustration of watching the same pattern play on loop - a terrorist attack, innocent lives lost, silence from the world, and once again, India is told to be “mature,” “calm,” and “restrained.”

How many Pulwamas? How many Pahalgams? How many coffins wrapped in our tricolour will it take before the world understands that peace without accountability is just a pause before the next tragedy?

India has tried. Again and again. Diplomatic talks, bilateral agreements, backchannel negotiations, and yet, terrorist camps continue to thrive across the border. How long are we expected to act like it’s not happening? And more importantly, why must we always be the ones trying?

Yes, I am anti-war. Yes, I believe in dialogue. But don’t confuse that with weakness. Because defending your people is not the opposite of peace ,it is the very foundation of it. What India did with Operation Sindoor wasn’t about revenge. It was about drawing a line , a line that should’ve been drawn long ago.

And let's address the said "diplomatic peace mediation" : the hypocrisy of international response. IMF loans flowing into a country that has harboured, sheltered, and at times even celebrated known terrorists. Social media giants gag Indian voices calling out terrorism, but conveniently stay silent when the hate flows the other way. Neutrality? Really? Or is it just comfortable indifference?

No, I don’t hate Pakistani civilians. I never will. But I will not pretend that both sides are equally innocent. I will not chant "peace" if it comes at the cost of more Indian blood. Because that’s not peace. That’s surrender.

India has done enough. Now, India is doing what it must. And if the world won’t understand that , maybe it never really cared.

I write this as someone who aches every time a soldier doesn’t return home. As someone who still wants peace , but not the kind that requires us to die for it.

Jai hind 🇮🇳