They Always Do.

they always do.

despite knowing India's capacity for a second strike.

The Pakistani leadership seems a-okay with implying that they will sacrifice their own civilians to save their personal egos or whatever it is they are wanting to protect by refusing to de-escalate.

rlly? playing the nuclear card?

More Posts from Thisismemanwtf and Others

2 weeks ago

To those saying India started a war, especially the white brain dead libtards need to pick up a fcking book.

This was a retaliation, not only for not just Pahalgam (2025) but

Mumbai (1993)

Parliament Attacks (2001)

Mumbai (2006)

Mumbai (2008)

Akshardham (2002)

Jaipur (2008)

Kashmir (1986-present)

Pathankot (2015)

Pulwama (2019)

And so many more.

To the "indian" cucks who are crying about "war bad", those bstrds have been killing our people for decades just because we didn't belong to the "right" religion, they had it coming. If the civilians had held the govt of theirs accountable things wouldn't had been this bad.

2 weeks ago

Sky News report shows how the Markaz Taiba mosque, which India destroyed during the Operation Sindoor, have been linked to Al-Qaeda and Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists. 

this is for the Libtards who are parroting ¡slamist victim play sources and crying about how "India attacked a mosque!!" 

2 weeks ago
PAKISTAN IS A TERRORIST STATE. PERIOD.
PAKISTAN IS A TERRORIST STATE. PERIOD.
PAKISTAN IS A TERRORIST STATE. PERIOD.
PAKISTAN IS A TERRORIST STATE. PERIOD.

PAKISTAN IS A TERRORIST STATE. PERIOD.

2 weeks ago

It's morally reprehensible to expect the price of peace to always be Indian lives.

I don't care if you hate 'pajeets' or whatever the newest slur you guys have cooked up for Indians is. The current world order has decades of agreement on the fact that all innocent lives matter equally.

So no, you can't chill and feel good about giving us thoughts and prayers while my people die horrid deaths just so your feelings are protected.

We don't like that civilians on the adversary's side are dying either. But no reasonable country is going to sign off on its own citizens continuing to die at random because some malcontents amongst its neighbours just want to see them die. Don't hold us to moral standards you yourselves don't meet.

When Peace Becomes a Wound: India, Terrorism, and the Weight of Restraint

I’ve always believed in peace. I still do. I don’t dream of war. I don’t find glory in bloodshed. And I certainly don’t believe revenge heals grief. But what happens when the very peace you’re protecting is the reason you keep losing your people? What happens when the other side doesn’t believe in peace at all?

This blog isn’t written out of hatred. It’s written out of heartbreak, confusion, and the raw frustration of watching the same pattern play on loop - a terrorist attack, innocent lives lost, silence from the world, and once again, India is told to be “mature,” “calm,” and “restrained.”

How many Pulwamas? How many Pahalgams? How many coffins wrapped in our tricolour will it take before the world understands that peace without accountability is just a pause before the next tragedy?

India has tried. Again and again. Diplomatic talks, bilateral agreements, backchannel negotiations, and yet, terrorist camps continue to thrive across the border. How long are we expected to act like it’s not happening? And more importantly, why must we always be the ones trying?

Yes, I am anti-war. Yes, I believe in dialogue. But don’t confuse that with weakness. Because defending your people is not the opposite of peace ,it is the very foundation of it. What India did with Operation Sindoor wasn’t about revenge. It was about drawing a line , a line that should’ve been drawn long ago.

And let's address the said "diplomatic peace mediation" : the hypocrisy of international response. IMF loans flowing into a country that has harboured, sheltered, and at times even celebrated known terrorists. Social media giants gag Indian voices calling out terrorism, but conveniently stay silent when the hate flows the other way. Neutrality? Really? Or is it just comfortable indifference?

No, I don’t hate Pakistani civilians. I never will. But I will not pretend that both sides are equally innocent. I will not chant "peace" if it comes at the cost of more Indian blood. Because that’s not peace. That’s surrender.

India has done enough. Now, India is doing what it must. And if the world won’t understand that , maybe it never really cared.

I write this as someone who aches every time a soldier doesn’t return home. As someone who still wants peace , but not the kind that requires us to die for it.

Jai hind 🇮🇳


Tags
2 weeks ago

Love how no one is talking about the lives that were lost last night in the cross border firing when Pakistan was shelling India. Were these people not innocent? Were they not as humans as the apparent civilian deaths in Pakistan? War does not favour anyone but apparently activism does.

2 weeks ago

This is a ridiculous premise though.

No 'magic combo' of religions or local/non-local or gender etc would have made it 'okay' that this terrorist group killed unarmed civilians on a vacation.

How The India Pakistan War 2025 Started?

How the India Pakistan war 2025 started?

Pakistani trained jihadists massacred unarmed Hindus. They asked their religion. Hindu men were massacred by ¡slamist terrorists, their womenfolk were left alive to "send a message to Modi". Look at this Nepali Hindu sister. Pakistani terrorists didn't care if she was Nepali and not Indian, even though Pakistanis claim that they have nothing against Nepalis. She is Hindu and that's all that mattered. 

And you're telling us to de-escalate. Hell no. Fuck outta here with that. Not a single jihadi shall be spared in a just worls.


Tags
5 months ago

Multiversal Recreation - The power to recreate the multiverse from its beginning state in any way the user wishes.

Astronomical Interaction - The power to interact with astronomical objects.

I would be a perfect fit for an Astronaut if I wasn't the very definition of bad health lol.

Click on it twice. These are your two super powers.

2 weeks ago

Sorry for some of the AI-speakensese below, I'm using ChatGPT to clean up my words here

By "standards of neutrality," I mean the way some people claim to be neutral when discussing India-Pakistan issues but seem to automatically frame India’s actions—like defending its borders or responding to attacks—as “invading” or aggressing against Pakistan. It’s like their baseline for “neutral” assumes India is always the instigator, ignoring context like cross-border militancy or provocations. I’m calling out that double standard where “neutrality” feels skewed against India.

I meant to share the NY Times article as a source with this standard of neutrality for people who read the posts that show India's side and immediately screen "oh but where is the 'neutral' Western media coverage for it?"

so that's what happened

So That's What Happened

So That's What Happened
So That's What Happened
So That's What Happened
So That's What Happened

one of these days yeh america ka ladla beta pakistan hamare haath se bohot buri tarah se pitega

2 weeks ago

India did it again. Their cowardice is out of this world. Targeting a mosque? That too in the dead of night? Going the Israel route I see. Like master like pet ig.

  • magic-coffee
    magic-coffee liked this · 2 weeks ago
  • sirikenobilegends
    sirikenobilegends liked this · 2 weeks ago
  • pan-diasaster
    pan-diasaster liked this · 2 weeks ago
  • thisismemanwtf
    thisismemanwtf reblogged this · 2 weeks ago
  • myselfexploring
    myselfexploring liked this · 2 weeks ago
  • piya-re
    piya-re reblogged this · 2 weeks ago
thisismemanwtf - Untitled
Untitled

53 posts

Explore Tumblr Blog
Search Through Tumblr Tags