*Do NOT repost anything without linking this post
Please make sure to support the original manga legally by visiting the Young Ace Up site and giving it kudos!! đđ
(Original JP link found on replies)
Follow, RT, Like official accounts and posts on twitter! đđ
@ youngace_up
@ kanaineco
Out of all of the many many reasons I love gear 5, one I haven't talked about yet is how much Luffy so obviously loves gear 5 as well.
It is honestly revolutionary to have a shonen protag's final form be enjoyable for them. To not be something born out of anger or hate; a thing born out of strict necessity that has to be unlocked by painful emotions/the loss of someone they loved (temporary or otherwise) but rather born out of joy and a desire for freedom. To have them want to be in that final form, to have it spit in the face of the idea that the only way to be powerful is to be serious, edgy, ""mature"" and to abandon joy and happiness in favor of that.
I LOVE that Luffy's final power-up doesn't come at the cost of who he is as a person, and instead amplifies and uplifts who he is. It uplifts his carefree nature, his goofiness, his creativity, his sense of wonder. And as such, the form is something that he enjoys more than any other gear he has used. It allows him to be the freest version of himself, allows him to bend the world around him to his whims, of course he's going to love it.
It also (in a weird way) acts as a message of self love. Luffy does not have to abandon who he is to become stronger, but rather has to lean even further into who he is. The traits that make him 'weird' and 'strange' by pirate (or hell, even just by regular standards) are the very things that boost him up and allow him to win against his foes.
A "ridiculous power" Kaido called it, and yet it was that power that sent him hurdling to the center of the earth, toppling his reign over Wano with the very thing he robbed from its people.
Do you think tsukasa would have been self-destructive even if he had had a normal life? (without evil entities or supernatural sacrifices)
Probably not. Everything that is happening now is the result of Amane's efforts to save Tsukasa from the entity. If the entity doesn't exist, Amane would die from the disease (probably, considering that it's not the entity that's making him sick).
If he survived the disease, they would live peacefully, but I still believe that Tsukasa would feel rejected, because of Hanako's natural behavior, but Tsukasa would have no reason to leave.
He had gone to save Amane, but if Amane never got sick, then it would just be a matter of relationship.
We don't know if Tsukasa is really cruel at times because it's part of his nature or if it's because of the entity, so we'll have that doubt.
But if Amane died, I would have serious doubts about what Tsukasa would do⌠although I have a hunch.
Happy anniversary to inky mystery! Thank you for recreating babtqftim! @thisanimatedphantom
i world love to hear your opinion đ
what if tsukasa exploded with anger and told hanako that he did all this to make him hate him and remove his seal because he doesn't want to stay and continue with his brother and that he would rather disappear đ
How will hanako react and what will he do ???
I got carried away sorry đ
PLEASE THAT'S WHAT I WANT!!!!!!
Tsukasa, speak openly about what you are feeling clearly!!!
Despite that, I wonder how Hanako would react, he's the one who needs to open up, and if he didn't do that even when Tsukasa was about to die, I wonder what would make Hanako honest.
He doesn't talk about his feelings, not even to Nene, she has to read between the lines.
I wonder what it will take to make Hanako finally say what he truly feels.
Hanako would probably find a way out of this situation without responding directly to what Tsukasa said.
THEY WERE SO FREAKING CUTE IN THIS SCENE *SCREAMS*
everyone take a look at the specialest boy
So, I finally read Bungou Stray Dogs. And yâall, I freaking love this manga. Itâs got themes of life, grief, death, trauma, and is chock-full of literary references and puns.Â
Shocking no one, one of my favorite charactersâthe reason I started reading the storyâis Dostoyevsky, since Iâm⌠rather an admitted fangirl of Dostoyevskyâs novels. Iâve reread each of them at least twice and some (C&P) up to five times. Clearly BSDâs Dostoyevsky not the hopeful, faithful author, but heâs definitely a fascinating antagonist whose arc is digging into the themes of Dostoyevsky the writerâs novelsâwith a particular focus on the two novels that are my very favorite novels ever written, by anyone, in history: Crime and Punishment and Demons.Â
But in truth, it draws more from Demons than from Crime and Punishment, right down to having BSD!Dostoyevsky directly quote it.
Demons is far, far less popular that Crime and Punishment, The Brothers Karamazov, and even The Idiot, so I was really surprised to see how often itâs been referenced in BSD (The reason itâs less popular is honestly justified: the first 100 pages are paced⌠horribly, but the rest of the novel is so powerful that I can overlook that). Itâs been translated under a variety of titles as well: The Possessed, The Devils, and the most recent is Demons so thatâs what weâre going with in this meta.
Pssstâlook at how often BSD!Dostoyesvky is associated with demons or devils:
Yet Demons has been popular with literary theorists (one well-known critic has described it as containing âthe most harrowing scene in all of fiction,â an assessment Iâd agree withâand this is the scene Iâm going to discuss in detail) and existentialists like Camus (sorry Camus). Anyways, I have a soft spot for Demons because it contains my very favorite character in existence: Alexei Nilyich Kirillov, who is the character BSD!Dostoyesvky directly quotes.
@blackandwhitemusician did a great analysis of the similar philosophies BSD!Dostoyevsky shares with Crime and Punishmentâs Raskolnikov, but I want to talk about how BSD!Dostoyevsky is also modeled after Kirillovâs philosophical ideas. This isnât to say he embodies them, because Kirillov is decidedly not a villain unlike BSD!Dostoyevsky, but BSD!Dostoyevsky definitely draws heavily from Kirillovâs ideals.
Kirillov is a character who, like Raskolnikov, embodies the contradictions of human nature, but in a hyperbolic way. Heâs noted to have a âcalm but warm and kindly expression"and adores children, playing with them, and he even helps his friend Shatovâs wife give birth (heâs endearingly awkward and scared for the whole ordeal). He affirms that he is âfond of lifeâ and yet he is determined, from the moment we meet him, to shoot himself as suicide because in doing so he will save himself and the world.Â
Kirillovâs reasoning is complex and at the same time, spotty, and stems from a deep despair and disgust with human sin. Sound familiar?
Time is also a major motif with BSD! Dostoyevsky and with Kirilllov. He does not believe in time as more than an âidea.â He insists that âlife exists, but death doesnât at all⌠[I believe] in eternal life here. There are moments, you reach moments, and time suddenly stands still, and it will become eternal.â
(Clocks constantly appear in BS chapter 42, Dostoyevskyâs introduction, as well.)
Kirillov also draws from other philosophies such as Descartesâ âI think, therefore I am,â affirming that âman is unhappy because he doesnât know heâs happy⌠If they knew that it was good for them, it would be good for them, but as long as they donât know itâs good for them, it will be bad for them. Thatâs the whole idea, the whole of it⌠Theyâll find out that theyâre good and theyâll all become good, every one of them.â
In other words, reality is what Kirillov makes of it in his own mind, which is what BSD!Dostoyevsky hints his ability is (but it isnât).
Itâs still a belief BSD!Dostoyevsky holds: that his beliefs create reality.
Kirillov muses, in conversation with his friend Stavrogin (bold is Kirillov):
âHe who teaches that all are good will end the world.â
âHe who taught it was crucified.â
âHe will come, and his name will be the man-god.â
âThe god-man?â
âThe man-god. Thatâs the difference.â
In BSD, anything written in The Book becomes truth, and Dostoyevsky plans to use it to rid the world of the sins of ability-users. Similarly, Kirillov plans to use his decision to set people free, and Pyotr plans to use Kirillovâs mental instability and philosophical suicide to erase consequences for his own sins. And as Kirillov also believes this will make moments heaven, Dostoyevsky expresses (using religious language) that this will make a heavenly reality as well:
As Demons goes on, we find out that Pyotr Stepanovich had struck a deal with Kirillov. Since Kirillov really tries to believe that everyone and everything is good, when Pyotr asks him to kill himself and write a note specifying something Pyotr wonât specify until the time comes, to help Pyotr, Kirillov agrees. Pyotr notes that he doesnât tell Kirillov what he plansâto have Kirillov take the blame for the murder of their mutual friend Shatov, which Pyotr commitsâbecause he thinks that if Kirillov knows in advance, âKirillov could not be relied upon.â
The irony, of course, is that by seeking to prove the ultimate will in the universe is of the individual, that the individual is his/her own god, Kirillov becomes an unwitting tool in Pyotr Stepanovichâs terrible plots. He contributes to the unjust death of someone he cares deeply for by taking the blame. And Kirillov did not want this at all. When Pyotr comes to collect, he realizes what heâs done (bold is Kirillov_:
âHe is dead!â cried Kirillov, jumping up from the sofa.
âHe died at seven oâclock this evening, or rather, at seven oâclock yesterday evening, and now itâs one oâclock.â
âYou have killed him!â
âŚ
âYou are a strange man, though, Kirillov; you knew yourself that the stupid fellow was bound to end like this. What was there to foresee in that? I made that as plain as possible over and over again. Shatov was meaning to betray us; I was watching him, and it could not be left like that. And you too had instructions to watch him; you told me so yourself three weeks ago.âŚâ
âŚ
âI wonât write that I killed Shatov ⌠and I wonât write anything now. You wonât have a document!â
Pyotr refuses to leave until Kirillov is dead, and Kirillov explains that âI wonât put it off; I want to kill myself now: all are scoundrels.â The exact opposite of what he expressed before about things being good.
âHeâs guessed the truth at last! Can you, Kirillov, with your sense, have failed to see till now that all men are alike, that there are none better or worse, only some are stupider, than others, and that if all are scoundrels (which is nonsense, though) there oughtnât to be any people that are not?â
And then we see what motivates Kirillov is a desperate need to have a reason to match his desire to live. Itâs literally one of the main themes of Bungo Stray Dogs (bold is Kirillov):
 âIf you stopped yourself, you become God; thatâs it, isnât it?â
âYes, I become God.â
âŚ
âLet it be comfort. God is necessary and so must exist⌠But I know He doesnât and canât⌠Surely you must understand that a man with two such ideas canât go on living?â
And of course, this is BSD!âs Dostoyevsky in what I am betting is a direct quote from Demons as translated into Japanese: If god does not exist, then I am god.
His man-god belief, like Dostoyevskyâs in BSD, are explained thusly (bold is Kirillov):
âIâve always been surprised at every oneâs going on living,â said Kirillov, not hearing his remark.
âŚ
âHold your tongue; you wonât understand anything. If there is no God, then I am God.â
âThere, I could never understand that point of yours: why are you God?â
âIf God exists, all is His will and from His will I cannot escape. If not, itâs all my will and I am bound to show self-will.â
âSelf-will? But why are you bound?â
âBecause all will has become mine. Can it be that no one in the whole planet, after making an end of God and believing in his own will, will dare to express his self-will on the most vital point? Itâs like a beggar inheriting a fortune and being afraid of it and not daring to approach the bag of gold, thinking himself too weak to own it. I want to manifest my self-will. I may be the only one, but Iâll do it.â
Thatâs a direct quote.
BSD!Dostoyevsky manipulates human will to lead people into committing suicide, and is killing them to create a new world without the sins of ability-users:
Kirillov says this right before he finally writes the false confession to Stavroginâs murder and kills himself:
âMan has done nothing but invent God so as to go on living, and not kill himself; thatâs the whole of universal history up till now. I am the first one in the whole history of mankind who would not invent God. Let them know it once for allâŚ
âI am awfully unhappy, for Iâm awfully afraid. Terror is the curse of man.⌠But I will assert my will, I am bound to believe that I donât believe. I will begin and will make an end of it and open the door, and will save. Thatâs the only thing that will save mankind and will re-create the next generation physically; for with his present physical nature man canât get on without his former God, I believe. For three years Iâve been seeking for the attribute of my godhead and Iâve found it; the attribute of my godhead is self-will! Thatâs all I can do to prove in the highest point my independence and my new terrible freedom. For it is very terrible. I am killing myself to prove my independence and my new terrible freedom.â
Yet Kirillov is inventing god: himself. He signs the paper and then does kill himself, but itâs not without the last terrible, terrifying realization that he does not want to die. He wants to live. And he fights Pyotr, biting his finger nearly off, before committing suicide. But Kirillov, as wrong and tragic as his philosophy is, is the one who recognizes the theme of Demons.
âStavrogin, too, is consumed by an idea,â Kirillov said gloomily, pacing up and down the room.
The point of the entire tragedy in Demons is basically if you are consumed by an idea, it will turn you into a devil. Kirillov is, along with Shatov, perhaps the most likeable main character in Demons (others are far more horrifying as their various political, religious, and philosophical ideas take them over). And so is Dostoyevsky in BSD: consumed by his ideas, convinced his will is all that matters.
It wonât end well.
Good to know Chuuya is Dazai's personal rubber duck
Just going to rant about something I think I noticed in the new season, I am very very sleepy so this probably makes sense to me
-spoilers for the new season-
During the first season of the reboot Brain was very composed unlike in the third season. Where season one Brain wouldnât be seen crying, even when he explained his backstory to Pinky, in seasons 2-3 he is shown as much more emotional. But in season 3 this guy seems to be actually loosing it
In their last segment (How the Brain Thieved Christmas) Brainâs eyes were always uneven and look a little crazy
He was irrationally mad throughout the entire episode and couldnât seem to focus at all, which is uncharacteristic of him, especially when in season one he would never lose his train of thought wouldnât happen
Brain definitely was getting more âemotionalâ during the second season and let it slip a few times but I think what started to get to him was the episode Talladega Mice, with having to talk with Pinky and help him work through with his stress, having to contain some emotion. Then the episode Groundmouse Day happened and I think it really got to Brain and caused him to go a bit mad. After that, Brain has been saying and doing things spontaneously and is showing a completely different side while trying to maintain his âstern monotoneâ facade. Its surreal to see
And with this, its also obvious how much he has changed in the physical touch area, whereas in season 1 and 2, he would grab Pinkyâs hand a lot, pull him really close without having a second thought, season 3 Brain is completely different
He gets flustered over just a hand hold that is no different from every other time from the past 30 years
Then thereâs the kiss from Groundmouse Day that has him stunned while (probably in season 1) Brain gets kissed but he shows only aggression
Brainâs affection, or more just interacting with Pinky has decreased in this season and he seems to keep getting flustered over something Pinky has done a million times
So I think with all this information combined, I believe that Brain has been getting more insane if you will, or is in an odd headspace, and the suddenish change could be Brain has been getting unstable and could be causing his slip up in affection, or he knows about his blatant love for Pinky that it in turn is causing his insanity
Who knows which one it is, honestly I think its the latter
But hey thats just a theory
a Film Theory
iâll never wear your broken crown
Fan art for @frenchonionsoop âs AMAZING WORLD CHANGING stormbringer animatic!!!! Everyone go watch it NOW!!