Reblog If You ACTUALLY READ TAGS

Hey, so please nobody take their life tonight. If for nothing else do it for me, I would be devastated to find out that any of you had passed. No matter what happens- we have eachother’s backs.

Any reason is a good one to stay alive. Get some ice cream, call a friend, post some among us codes. Do what you can tonight to stay alive.

Crisis text line: text SHARE to 741741

💖⭐️💖⭐️🐱🐈✨💫🌟😺⭐️💖⭐️💖

Protection spell for your feline friends! Like to charge, reblog to cast.

⭐️ Let’s protect all the kitties! ⭐️

“Those poor boys”

“She deserves to be punished too.”

“I’m not saying I support rape, but-”

“Sorry to say - she deserved it.”

“She put herself in harm’s way”

“But if she was fingered, then that’s not rape.”

“She ruined their lives.”

Calling a canon bisexual woman a lesbian becuase she has a female love interest or is in a wlw relationship is bisexual erasure and biphobic!!!!

WE SHOULD HAVE LISTENED. 

Oh, to have a homoerotic enemy who becomes so obsessed with destroying you that both of your lives intertwine together so deeply that you are inseparable, like two super nova stars circling each other until one day you inevitably crash and cause the destruction of both of you and the entire universe in the process

The glue that holds us all together.

cbsnews.com

Supreme Court rules to protect police from lawsuits over violating Miranda rights

The conservative majority said officers are immune to civil lawsuits over Miranda violations because the warnings are not constitutional rig

Law enforcement officers who fail to provide criminal suspects with Miranda warnings prior to questioning cannot be subjected to civil lawsuits for their omissions, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday.

Justices determined by a 6-3 vote that receiving Miranda warnings — which notify individuals taken into custody of their rights to remain silent, speak with an attorney and ask for that attorney to be present during interactions with police — is not technically a protected constitutional right. 

The court's classification means that individuals deprived of their Miranda warnings before criminal interrogations take place will not have a foundation to bring legal claims that allege their civil rights were violated after the fact. It effectively protects police officers against civil litigation while also limiting individual protections against self-incrimination.

"A violation of Miranda does not necessarily constitute a violation of the Constitution," wrote Justice Samuel Alito in an opinion reflecting the court's conservative majority. In light of that, Alito said such a violation could not "authorize a civil rights suit against a police officer."

Mood

The   end   is   near. — Thanos