DISNEYLAND DEADPOOL SAYING HE AND WOLVERINE FUCKED. OK MAN. WHAT THE FUCK EVER.
Paul: *does anything* Feyd: ππ₯΅π
he's so cunty
this crazy ass ad... we should've gotten a twenty minute uninterrupted sloppy make out session at the end of first class instead of the divorce
Interpreting Marius from an historical angle with consideration of the values of ancient Rome and Renaissance Italy is valid.
Interpreting Marius from the angle of the authorβs intentions and statements about him is valid.
Interpreting Marius from the angle of gothic romance/gothic horror is valid.
Interpreting Marius from the angle of 21st century values and modern social politics is valid (and can be very interesting!).
Preferring one or several of these interpretations to others is valid.
Behaving like having/preferring a certain interpretation of a literary character is morally superior or morally reprehensible is, actually, a bit of a dick move.
And also, sorry to say this, butβ¦ the interpretation of a person who has read all available canon material about a character, will always be more valid than that of people who have not. If you want to discuss the books, you have to actually read them. And yes, of course this takes time, but itβs not hard to contextualize interpretations and statements with a sentence like βI have only read books x and y at this point" or even to say "I don't feel like I know enough to give a balanced interpretation on this yet."
tell me you guys see the vision here
ITS MARCH YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS
what do you mean it wasnβt a romcom
not on here much but if interested you can find me on Twitter as @botticelli4ngel :)
152 posts