Bill 47 Has Passed: Changes To Employment Standards Come Into Effect On January 1, 2019
Bill 47 has Passed: Changes to Employment Standards Come into Effect on January 1, 2019
On November 21, 2018 Bill 47, the Make Ontario Open for Business Act (“Bill 47”), passed Third Reading and received Royal Assent. This comes quickly on the heels of Bill 47’s first reading, on October 23, 2018 and its second reading on November 12, 2018. Bill 47 has not undergone any significant changes in relation to the Employment Standards Act (“ESA”) since our first blog post which you can read about here.
There have been some changes made to Bill 47 since first reading in relation to the Labour Relations Act (“LRA”). One change is that the Ontario Labour Relations Board is no longer empowered to review the structure of existing bargaining units on the basis that they are no longer appropriate.
Changes made to the LRA came into effect when Bill 47 received Royal Assent on November 21, 2018. Employers will have a little more time to adapt to changes to the ESA as they are scheduled to come into force on January 1, 2019. Employers seeking to review their policies to ensure they comply with the latest changes should obtain legal advice in advance of January 1, 2019.
Below are some of the key changes Bill 47 will make to employment legislation:
Changes to the Employment Standards Act (“ESA”) Personal emergency leave – This leave will be removed in its entirety and replaced by three separate unpaid leaves: sick leave (3 days), family responsibility leave (3 days), and bereavement leave (2 days). The bill also removes the prohibition on employers requesting medical documentation to support entitlement to these leaves.
Minimum wage – Instead of increasing to $15.00/hour on January 1, 2019, the minimum wage will stay at $14.00/hour until at least October 2020 when it will be adjusted for inflation.
Scheduling – Many of the scheduling changes introduced by Bill 148, which were scheduled to come into effect on January 1, 2019, will be repealed, including: the requirement for employers to respond to an employee’s request for changes to their schedule or work location; an employee’s right to refuse a request to work or be on call with less than 96-hours’ notice; the on-call pay provisions; and, the shift cancellation pay provisions.
Please note: under Bill 47 employers will still be required to pay employees who regularly work more than three hours for a minimum of three hours of work even if they work less than three hours.
Changes to the Labour Relations Act (“LRA”)
Lists of Employees – Employers will no longer be required to provide employee lists to trade unions who demonstrate at least 20% support in the proposed bargaining unit.
Remedial Certification – The pre-Bill 148 test and pre-conditions for the Ontario Labour Relations Board (“OLRB”) to certify a union for employer misconduct will be reinstated.
The foregoing is for informational purposes only, and should in no way be relied upon as legal advice. For legal advice tailored to your circumstances and business, please contact any of SOM LLP’s lawyers by email or telephone.
Originally posted on MalcolmMacKillop.com.
More Posts from Malcolmmackillop and Others
Cabin in British Columbia
© Andrew Latreille & Nic Lehoux
Malcolm MacKillop dives into the topic of workplace harassment by discussing Merrifield v. Canada.
Malcolm MacKillop shares an infographic based on his recent blog.
Yoho National Park, Canada / Andy Holmes
What medical information are employers allowed to ask for from employers? Malcolm MacKillop shares what’s legal and what’s not.
Part 2 of Malcolm MacKillop’s overview of the new mass termination provision of the ESA.
Workplace Bullying: Will You Know It When You See It?
The media, paired with political figures, have paid increased attention to workplace bullying in recent years. Legislators in 21 states have even introduced bills to address and combat workplace bullying, starting with California in 2003.
However, none of the legislatures in states which these bills have been introduced have passed the bills into law. There are a variety of explanations for why there has not been a change in the law despite workplace bullying becoming a hot button employment issue, but the most obvious explanation is this: it truly is difficult to define workplace bullying.
Keep reading
Can Employers Monitor Your Work Computer?
The issue of privacy on computers, that are used in a professional work environment, has become a discussion where legal parameters are regarding the limitations of personal and professional use. There are situations that arise within the legal system in which the courts must determine the lines of personal privacy of employees on work-supplied computers.
Read the full article at MalcolmMacKillop.com
In a Poisonous Work Environment?
Employee claims that include allegations of a poisoned or toxic work environment have become increasingly common in recent years. One such claim, General Motors of Canada Ltd. v. Johnson, recently made its way to the Ontario Court of Appeal. This gave Ontario’s highest court the opportunity to provide some much-needed clarification on this area of law.
General Motors of Canada Ltd. v. Johnson (“General Motors”)
In General Motors, Yohan Johnson (“Johnson”) claimed that he had been constructively dismissed from his employment at GM due to a racially poisoned work environment.
-
comfort44-blog liked this · 5 years ago -
malcolmmackillop reblogged this · 6 years ago
