TUMBLR IS SO BORING WITH ALL YOU NERDS AT DASHCON

I love old comics

What

So I'm working on a video describing webcomics in ten words or less and well some comics don't have covers so I had to make some(mostly for me cause its fun) and I really like how this one came out! @emmytherobotofficial

@galaxyghostr

Just finished watching Land of the Lustrous and wanted to make something for it so here Phos being a little bean that no harm will ever come to T^T

two sides same coin

Kermit for pope

I was trying to find out if Kermit was eligible to be pope and I found a blog that says he's the perfect example of a catholic priest

I love this advice

I've been very curious since ISAT has such strong characterization: what do you think makes a "well written" character? I've asked around in my circles and I've gotten different answers (serves their role in the plot well, 'you can imagine meeting a real person like this', they move the plot along in an interesting way, etc) but I was curious because ISAT is still fresh in my mind.

thank you very much... for me, if every action a character takes can be linked to a specific trait/backstory/whatever, thats a well written character. you dont need to know in the moment, but on a rewatch if you go "omg thats why they did this or said this..." you know thats the SAUCE!!!!!!!!

This pleases me greatly

Not taking any of Crayola’s shit today.

Dear video essay creators. A video analysis is when you analyze a piece of media. No no look at me. A summary, no matter how thorough, is not an analysis. An analysis requires you to draw conclusions about the media such as authorial intent, real-world parallels, discussion about themes/worldbuilding/character motivation, and so much more. You have to stop summarizing something and saying that’s analysis. The Gaylors are doing more critical analysis than you. Is that who you want to lose to? The gaylors?