Kazakhstan’s Stone Spheres

How did the dinosaurs die?

Is the mass extinction and the Chicxulub theory misleading? Many studies using new technologies show a perfect state of preservation in a way that the cells,  soft tissues and blood cells are so preserved as if they are still alive. that the scientists can even see that the cause of death was trauma and asphyxiation. But the scientists are hijacked by the mainstream extinction theory and came to the conclusion that they must have been caught in a flood and suffocated then buried and preserved. But this study proves that the preservation theory is totally wrong. The so called mineralization theory that takes a long time couldn’t be the case with dinosaur fossils because what we see in the microscopic images show that the preservation couldn’t have happen after a long time after death but on the contrary it must have happened instantly as many of the vital signs of life should have disappeared short after death as the cells start to decompose short after death, the cells have a self destructing mechanism and wouldn’t be preserved in the way seen in the study.                                A group of scientist is investigating some complex issues connected to dinosaur death and the state of preservation of bone structure and cells using different advanced technology. Remarkable discoveries such as condensed chromatin in duckbill dinosaur cartilage and newly presented discoveries of dinosaur vascular veins, venule valves, and nerve fibers and even preserved soft tissue. UV Autofluorescence Microscopy of Dinosaur Bone Reveals Encapsulation of Blood Clots within Vessel Canals.  Ultraviolet fluorescence (UVFL) study of Triceratops horn, rib, vertebra, and frill thin sections shows extensive clotting in most vessel canals, probably as a result of asphyxia though to happen while drowning.  While preservation methods for dinosaur soft tissues (dst) involve the degradation of sugars into glycation end products and the employment of highly oxidative hydroxyl radicals to “fix” tissues no hydroxyl radical infiltration into the lacuna-canalicular network was found. And even the autolytic destruction of cells and intracellular contents may begin within seconds after death. This means that the petrification process happened very fast after death before hydroxyl radical did occur. This contradicts the mainstream mineralization theory which assumes that the process took a long time. When this theory occurred there wasn’t any ability to observe what can be seen today and they wouldn’t be able to explain such a status of preservation. Under new microscopy the specimens look as if they were still alive. Dinosaur remains, especially fossil bone, continue to reveal exceptionally preserved dinosaur soft tissues (dST) including endogenous osteocytes, chondrocytes, intact vessels, collagen, and other soft tissues that have been widely reported from dinosaur compact bone fossils. Recently, condensed chromatin within chondrocyte nuclei undergoing chondroptosis-mimicking cellular metaphase was reported from duckbill dinosaur fossil material recovered in the late 1980s at the Two Medicine Formation in Montana and other dinosaurs from other places.

Using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) soft tissue structures; venous valves, veins, and nerve fibers, from Triceratops horridus bone and even valve leaflets have been found. Normally after death within hours blood cells lyse, iron is freed from the hemoglobin and generates copious amounts of hydroxyl radicals, which would be expected to damage ultrathin valve cuspids and other soft cells but no damage blood cells lyse, iron is freed from the hemoglobin and generates copious amounts of hydroxyl radicals, which would be expected to damage ultrathin valve cuspids (see Soft Tissue Preservation Methods below). We observed no damage was  blood cells lyse, iron is freed from the hemoglobin and generates copious amounts of hydroxyl radicals, which would be expected to damage ultrathin valve cuspids and other soft cells but no such  damage was observed. Nerves were recovered from T. horridus exhibited under birefringence in polarized light. Polarized light examination of extant vertebrate nerves reveals an undulating or zig-zagging sub-structure called “Bands of Fontana,” a feature characteristic of vertebrate nerves. These white bands are also seen in the dinosaur nerve fiber. All this is a sign that the petrification was very fast or even instant. In the case of the Triceratops horn examination, collected from the Hell Creek Formation, suggesting that Fenton reactions never occurred within the lacuno-canalicular network of the horn and thus never acted on cell membranes or filipodial extensions. Another sign that the petrification was so fast before this process even could start.  In the case of Triceratops animals buried at Hell Creek, trauma and asphyxiation are suggested as the cause of death thought drowning while suffering major tissue injury in a flooding event according to the mainstream theory. The heavy clotting of the microvasculature within bones suggest the drowning theory. The mainstream extinction and petrification theory is totally wrong. The dinosaurs must have been killed by an unknown cosmic force that led to the instant petrification of the dinosaurs that caused the death of the animals and also trees that faced the same apocalyptic catastrophe, which could be a fore driven by the impact.. The sudden petrification caused an instant failure of the organs that led to the mentioned observations including breathing. The mainstream petrification or mineralization theory don’t provide real data about the process they suggest like the timeline of the process and did it start from the outside to the inside or reversed. We don’t see that the petrification did happen in stages as we should see layers that shown a timescale and stages of the process, what we see is that the process happened at one time for the whole specimen. If the process would have started from the outside to the inside the outer layer would prevent any fluid getting through as the density wouldn’t allow that to happen. And if reversed from the inside to the outside the outside layers would suffer greater erosion which isn’t the case. Scientist should look what led to the petrification because what is observed is that the fluids or water inside the bones is what have been preserved, just turned to silicate, the minerals inside the specimen didn’t come from the surrounding environment but are the minerals that are inside the fluids while living like metabolism. A cosmic force that don’t normally exist on earth must have changed the atomic structure of the water. That is possible as gem stones and diamonds have been created from gases in the lab under extreme conditions.

The source:

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/microscopy-today/article/uv-autofluorescence-microscopy-of-dinosaur-bone-reveals-encapsulation-of-blood-clots-within-vessel-canals/8762E671960898DAC303973A5A2A93F6

 Living dinosaurs just frozen in time

Every one knows the story of Medusa, and those who gazed upon her face just turned to stone. But did something similar happened to the dinosaur? Was this cosmic cataclysmic event the Medusa?                                                                 A new study, led by materials scientist Sergio Bertazzo and paleontologist Susannah Maidment  at the Imperial College London discovered soft tissue in a a claw of a therapod. 

When imaging the fresh-cut surfaces with scanning and transmission electron microscopes through a mass spectrometer, what appeared to be red blood cells and collagen fibers. They tried to get the weight of the component molecules. The weights came back as identical to those of the three most common amino acids in collagen which proved the existence of collagen, they even discovered that the fossil’s blood cells had nuclei. more discoveries have been made, Bertazzo was examining another fossil fragment, a piece of rib from some unidentified dinosaur, which had been sliced in two inside the microscope. He spotted bands of fibres, which further tests found to contain amino acids known that make up collagen, the protein-based material that forms the basis for skin and other soft tissues. 

The imageabove: (a) Amorphous carbon-rich material (red) surrounded by dense material (green). Scale bar, 5 μm. (b) Erythrocyte-like structures composed of carbon surrounded by cement. Scale bar, 1 μm. For comparison, fixed blood from an emu (Dromaius) is shown in Supplementary Fig. 2c, d. Fibrous structures. Scale bar, 5 μm in (c) and 1 μm in (d).

It’s not the first time to find Intact soft tissue in dinosaur fossils before, most famously by Mary Schweitzer at North Carolina State University, who in 2005 found flexible, transparent collagen in the fossilised leg of a Tyrannosaurus Rex specimen.    

But again this raises the question about the environmental conditions are needed for their preservation. This degree of preservation contradicts the main stream theory that the preservation is a result of being buried in soil for millions of years as these components would decay after a short time. Back to my hypothesis that this preservation could only happen in a very short time, a matter of nano seconds due to a cosmic event and not a common activity that normally happens on earth, it’s the same event that led to the extinction. We notice that this kind of preservation is a pattern just in the species that belong to the dinosaur world.

Read: https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/75-million-year-old-blood-cells-discovered-in-dinosaur-bones

https://www.slashgear.com/scientists-break-dinosaur-bones-find-red-blood-cells-09387548/

https://www.wsj.com/video/scientists-may-have-found-dinosaur-blood-cells/2D6CB138-9ADA-4527-9760-1968294BFECA.html

Carbon-14-dated dinosaur bones are less than 40,000 years old

This study could be an evidence that supports my hypothesis about the petrification of the dinosaurs and if they really existed on earth questioning the mainstream theory about the petrification of the dinosaurs and it’s dating. But the big question is: is the main stream science censoring new studies and hypothesis? 

Researchers have found a reason for the puzzling survival of soft tissue and DNA fragments in dinosaur bones - the bones are younger than anyone ever guessed.  Carbon-14 (C-14) dating of multiple samples of bone from 8 dinosaurs found in Texas, Alaska, Colorado, and Montana revealed that they are only 22,000 to 39,000 years old.  

Members of the Paleochronology group presented their findings at the 2012 Western Pacific Geophysics Meeting in Singapore, August 13-17, a conference of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) and the Asia Oceania Geosciences Society (AOGS).

Since dinosaurs are thought to be over 65 million years old, the news is stunning - and more than some could tolerate.  After the AOGS-AGU conference in Singapore, the abstract was removed from the conference website by two chairmen because they could not accept the findings.  Unwilling to challenge the data openly, they erased the report from public view without a word to the authors.  When the authors inquired, they received this letter:

Source: https://www.newgeology.us/presentation48.html

Scientists study rare dinosaur skin fossil to determine skin colour for first time

The image on the top This fossilized dinosaur skin belonged to Hadrosaurids, which were duck-billed dinosaurs that roamed Earth during the Upper Cretaceous geological epoch that began 100 million years ago, and ended 66 million years ago. They were common in Europe, Asia, and North America.   Another well preserved dinosaur skin samples ever found is being tested at the Canadian Light Source (CLS) synchrotron to determine skin colour and to explain why the fossilized specimen remained intact after 70-million years. https://phys.org/news/2013-04-scientists-rare-dinosaur-skin-fossil.html 

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071203103349.htm

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071203103349.htm

Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSkNdBgI6NU

The Schwarzschild radius theory

The Schwarzschild radius theory could be wrong as the mass can't be compressed that contradicts the laws of physics as the internal force inside the atom wouldn't allow it, there will be a nuclear fusion and energy. But when the star collapses two different things happen: a gravitational wave pulling the surrounding matter due to the vacuum happened and at the same time the emission of the remaining gasses from the collapsed star escaping from the center of the black hole making a 90 degrees angle in the form of a jet. And here we see the matter ejected from the center and don’t form a high density sphere as the Schwarzschild theory imagine, there is no matter left in the center. Source: https://www.space.com/baby-black-holes-misbehaving-experts-perplexed

Earth crust and impacts

There is evidence that the earth is hosting extraterrestrial rocks but the difference to my hypothesis is that I think that lots of it is much younger than predicted could be even thousands of years and not millions proven by young Iridium traces found in many parts of the earth. Why don’t we find enough craters on earth like on moon although our earth has a stronger pulling power? 

it is because the older craters have been covered by younger once.

Here an article by the National Geographic tells a little bit about rocks that visited our planet and made changes in the earth crust;

Holdsworth and his colleagues had an inkling that the rotated layers and other curious features of the rock’s fractures might be the result of a precipitous plunge, but they needed more data to make the case. So Killingback took on the challenge for his master's thesis research.

More about this interesting story:

https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/science-and-technology/2020/10/in-what-is-today-scotland-before-plants-or-animals-existed-this

I wrote a theory about the extinction of dinosaurs and I came to the conclusion that the dinosaurs didn’t live on earth but on an another planet, a twin planet or moon that have been either captured by the gravity of earth or most probably hit by an asteroid or comet that...

Granite, Meteorites and black holes

About my hypothesis that granite isn’t a of a volcanic origin but of an extraterrestrial origin, below is a satellite image of the Brandberg Granite Mountain in Namibia clearly seen the dark circle around the mountain caused by the heat of the impact. Actually the hole mountain is an impact body and one of many that hit the earth. By using modern seismic instruments such as seismographs it should be possible to prove that this mountain is a real mountain having mountain roots or not, or if it’s connected to any volcanic source or not.

Gem stones created in space

As a proved for my hypothesis that gem stones have been created in space under extreme physics conditions and not due to volcanic activities and that’s probably what happened to the petrified dinosaur bone. A dying star with a mass similar to the Sun is capable of producing a structure on par with the appeal of these beautiful gems. A new image of a bubble of ultra-hot gas at the center of one of these expiring stars, a planetary nebula in our galaxy called IC 4593. At a distance of about 7,800 light years from Earth 4593 has X-rays from Chandra in purple, invoking similarities to amethysts found in geodes around the globe. The bubble detected by Chandra is from gas that has been heated to over a million degrees. These high temperatures were likely generated by material that blew away from the shrunken core of the star and crashed into gas that had previously been ejected by the star. This composite image also contains visible light data from the Hubble Space Telescope (pink and green). The pink regions in the Hubble image are the overlap of emission from cooler gas composed of a combination of nitrogen, oxygen, and hydrogen, while the green emission is mainly from nitrogen. According to my hypothesis that the water or Oxygen in the dinosaur bones is what have been converted to an opalised bone and the different colors within the petrified bones is due to the minerals in the fluids inside the bone and not from the soil covering the fossil. Source: https://phys.org/news/2020-11-cosmic-amethyst-dying-star.html?fbclid=IwAR0Njf6XNdLqCDNWrouPgFDCPjcQOSbtrThQnyN5HWJA6JUMtOX0k940sro

Observations of M87's monster black hole

In the spring of 2017, as the EHT team was gathering some of the data that would result in the epic imagery, nearly 20 other powerful telescopes on the ground and in space were studying the M87 black hole as well. A new study describes this huge and powerful data set, which contains observations across a wide range of wavelengths gathered by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, Chandra X-ray Observatory, the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) and Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, as well as a number of other scopes.  Jets, or beams of radiation and fast-moving particles have been observed rocketing outward from M87's black hole. This observation is an evidence that the Schwarzschild radius theory could be wrong as the mass can't be compressed that contradicts the laws of physics as the internal force inside the atom wouldn't allow it, there will be a nuclear fusion and energy. But when the star collapses two different things happen: a gravitational wave due to the vacuum happened and the emission of the remaining gasses of the collapsed star escaping the black hole from the center of the black hole making a 90 degrees angle. As we see here that the matter is escaping and not been compressed. And here we see clearly that the matter is escaping the center of the black hole in the form of jets and not being trapped forming high density matter that doesn't exist in reality.

Source: https://www.space.com/m87-supermassive-black-hole-observing-campaign?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_content=space.com&utm_campaign=socialflow&fbclid=IwAR3B_J79lV_AO8tbkyMtLhrP5FxU2hNksY95i-wYJ2g-amL9AqfueUFjlT0